In
  • 499 words


The Furman men’s basketball team reacts to the news of their No. 15 seed placement in the NCAA Tournament during a Selection Sunday watch party at Timmons Arena. Photo by Nathan Gray, Furman University.

Every March, hope and probability collide in the NCAA Division I Men’s Basketball Tournament. This year, Furman University enters the bracket as a No. 15 seed – exactly the kind of team fans hope might become a Cinderella. The math, however, tells a more cautious story.

a white woman and two white men posing with basketballs.

Liz Bouzarth, Kevin Hutson and John Harris ’91, Department of Mathematics

For Furman math professors Kevin Hutson and Liz Bouzarth and John Harris ’91, the drama of March is rooted in probabilities. Each year the trio analyzes tournament matchups using a data-driven model that estimates the likelihood of upsets across the bracket. When they ran the numbers for this year’s tournament, Hutson says the Paladins face long – but not hopeless – odds.

“Furman has about a 7% chance of an upset,” Hutson says. “That’s sort of the bad news. The good news is if you look at all the 15 seeds this year, that’s the best chance any of them has.”

That number comes from a model built and refined over more than a decade, often with help from Furman students. Hutson, Bouzarth and Harris pull game-by-game statistics from ESPN and season metrics from analytics databases, then run the data through a variety of techniques – regression models, clustering analysis, decision trees and historical matchup comparisons. Each model contributes to what Hutson calls an “ensemble model,” blending multiple analytical perspectives into a single upset probability.

The work doesn’t stay inside the classroom. Each year their analysis is shared with sports journalists, including writers at The Athletic, who use the probabilities to identify the tournament’s most likely upsets and the storylines hidden in the numbers.

Still, Bouzarth emphasizes that the model doesn’t predict winners—it measures likelihood.

“The type of information we provide is the probability of an upset,” she says. “Anybody can do with that information what they want.”

That uncertainty is exactly what makes March Madness so compelling. Even the best models miss surprises. When the team ranks the 10 most likely upsets each year, Hutson says, “we usually hit about five or six out of that 10,” while a few unexpected results slip through.

And that’s where Cinderella stories live.

A 7% probability might sound small. But in a tournament defined by chaos, it’s also enough to imagine the possibility that Furman could beat the numbers, bust a few brackets and turn a sliver of probability into one of March’s most memorable moments.



Source link

Author

Related Posts

In

Who reaches their first final at La Caja Mágica?

MADRID — We’re down to our final four at the Mutua Madrid Open.  In a tournament that’s been full of surprises, Mirra...

Read out all
In

How the War Saved the Iranian Regime – Foreign Affairs

How the War Saved the Iranian Regime  Foreign Affairs Iran’s Guards seize wartime power, weakening Supreme Leader’s role  Reuters How Iran has changed, and...

Read out all
In

The Utah Jazz Should Target Rui Hachimura in Free Agency

Heading into this year’s NBA offseason and free agency later in July, the Utah Jazz could have just enough cap space to...

Read out all
In

Ridglan Farms to transfer nearly 1,000 beagles to rescue group | Top Stories

Ridglan Farms appears to be selling nearly 1,000 of its beagles to a rescue group which seeks to offer them a...

Read out all
In

Snow storm to hit Colorado into May, despite snow drought

Updated April 29, 2026, 9:39 a.m. ET The forecast calls for late-April and early May snowfalls in parts of Colorado, Montana and...

Read out all
In

Police declare terrorist incident after two Jewish men stabbed in north London – BBC

Police declare terrorist incident after two Jewish men stabbed in north London  BBC Two Jewish men stabbed in north London, with police declaring...

Read out all